© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
Sakr
8
positive and negative. Second, there is an ef-
fect of additional virulence genes in
P. hals-
tedii
races for variation of aggressiveness as
observed for other pathogens (Brown and
Tellier, 2011). Knowledge of virulence cost,
trade-off between virulence and aggres-
siveness, would help to understand the dy-
namics of sunflower downy mildew popula-
tions that use their pathogenicity to better
improve adaptation to their environment.
Indeed, Van der Plank (1968) defined the
cost of virulence as reduction in pathogen
fitness induced by a mutation from an aviru-
lence state to virulence, and the changes in
pathogen aggressiveness resulting direct-
ly from the loss of avirulence gene function.
Indeed, Sakr (2012c) found that the 100 and
3xx avirulent races had a virulence cost mea-
sured by differences in aggressiveness (from
58.3 to 78.2%, depicts aggressiveness from
the virulent to a virulent state) compared
to 7xx virulent races carrying unnecessary
virulence gene. However, accumulation of
virulence genes results in reduced aggres-
siveness as observed for
Puccinia graminis
f.
sp.
avenae
(Leonard 1969),
Bipolaris maydis
(Leonard 1977),
Puccinia graminis
f.sp.
triti-
ci
(Grant and Archer 1983) and for
Erysiphe
graminis
f. sp.
hordei
(Grant and Archer 1983).
Usually in a gene for gene interaction, viru-
lence cost in new races comes from loss (and
not accumulation) or mutation of avr genes
that might contribute to virulence (Stahl
and Bishop 2000). The trade-off between
virulence and aggressiveness probably has
considerable consequences for
P. halstedii
evolution, because races that accumulate a
large number of virulence genes might nev-
er be the most aggressive on sunflower gen-
otypes. Moreover, it seems that negative re-
lationship between the two components of
pathogenicity may play an important role in
generating local adaptation in the pathosys-
tem of
P. halstedii
and sunflower by imped-
ing the emergence and evolution of races
that are both highly aggressive and capable
of multiplying on all sunflower genotypes.
Regarding the correlation between
pathogenicity traits and genetic variability,
Sakr (2011a, 2013) found no correlation be-
tween molecular genotypes and pathoge-
nicity traits. The low degree of association
between traits of virulence and aggressive-
ness and the molecular variation is expedit-
ed considering the high degree of variation
in pathogenicity of
P. halstedii
. However, the
lack of matching between pathogenicity
traits and groups based on molecular mark-
ers was not surprising. Indeed, Montarry
et
al
. (2006) did not find a clear correlation be-
tween phenotypes and genotypes based
on molecular markers for
Phytophthora in-
festans
.
Pathogenicity is known to evolve
through mutation without highly altering
molecular fingerprints (Goodwin, 1997). Be-
cause most molecular markers used for fin-
gerprinting are selectively neutral, they can
be used to assess evolutionary forces other
than selection (such as gene flow or genetic
drift). Concerning the correlation between
pathogenicity traits and morphological
characteristics in sunflower downy mil-
dew races, Sakr (2013) found no correlation
between morphological genotypes and
pathogenicity traits. Sakr (2013) found that
the proportion of zoosporangia of different
forms and their sizes and the morphology of
sporangiophores do not appear to be use-
able to differentiate the virulent character-
istics for
P. halstedii
isolates. The results also
showed that zoosporangia and sporangio-
phores morphology did not distinguish the
aggressiveness groups. Regarding the cor-
relation between morphological traits and
genetic variability, Sakr (2013) found no cor-
relation between molecular genotypes and
morphological traits.
Durable resistance in sunflower against
Plasmopara halstedii
Regarding the intervention between
pathogenic variation in
P. halstedii
and dura-
bility of resistance in sunflower plants, new
data (Sakr, 2009, 2011a,b,c, 2012a,b,c, 2013)
showed that large variation in pathogenic-
ity has been detected within and between
P. halstedii
races. Such variation could arise
due to the agroecological environment,
host diversity, cultural practices, and sexu-
al recombination. According to Sakr (2009,
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,...34