© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
Bempelou
et al.
78
yl maleate and piperonyl butoxide (one in a
time), no significant inhibition (<5%) was ob-
served in the development of their cultiva-
tions. Therefore 10 μg/mL of each enzymat-
ic inhibitor was added in the 250 mL flasks
of the biodegradation trials. As it was ob-
served after 10 days of incubation, triphenyl
phosphate did not affect the biodegrada-
tion of diazinon by
Rh. glutinis
and
Rh. rubra
and similar results were produced after the
addition of piperonyl butoxide. On the con-
trary, diethyl maleate substantially inhibit-
ed the biodegradation rate of diazinon. Af-
ter the end of the experiment 92.2% of the
initial concentration of diazinon was recov-
ered. These results enforced the above pre-
liminary statements that GSTs are involved
in the biodegradation of diazinon by the
two epiphytic yeasts.
Biodegradation pathway
The biodegradation of diazinon by the
epiphytic yeasts
Rh. glutinis
and
Rh. rubra
is
attributed to the cleavage of the parent moi-
ety by the action of the enzymes of gluta-
thione- S- transferases and the conjugation
of glutathione with the leaving group. The
conjugate is afterwards hydrolyzed and the
metabolite 2-isopropoyl-6-methyl-4-pyrim-
idinol (IMP) is produced (Figure 6).
Biodegradation of diazinon on tomato
fruits
The biodegradation of diazinon by the
yeasts
Rh. glutinis
and
Rh. rubra
in tomato
fruits is shown in Table 2. Obviously the de-
crease of diazinon in the treated samples is
much higher in comparison with the con-
trol. In control samples diazinon showed a
Figure 4.
Effect of temperature in the biodegradation of diazinon by the yeasts
Rhodotorula glutinis
and
Rhodotorula rubra
,
after the incubation of the microorganisms with 10 μg/mL diazinon in 15°C, 25°C and 35°C, respectively.
1...,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,...43