© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
LC-MS/MS multiresidue method in peaches
79
ulizing gas, with pressures set at 18 and 55
psi, respectively. For the operation in MS/MS
mode, Argon 99.999% (Messer) was used as
collision gas at a pressure of 1.5 mTorr. The
multiple reaction monitoring experiments
were conducted with a dwell time of 100
msec, except for aldicarb, hexaconazole and
hexythiazox for which the dwell time was
set at 300, 200 and 300 msec, respectively.
For instrument control, data acquisition and
processing, Varian MS Workstation software
version 6.8 was used.
5. Sample extraction
The extraction was based on the acetone–
dichloromethane–petroleum ether multiresi-
due method developed by the Dutch Minis-
try of Public Health, Welfare and Sport (16).
The use of acetone (a water-miscible sol-
vent) provides the extraction of the analytes
without extracting the larger lipid volumes
that later cause emulsions and interferenc-
es. With the addition of immiscible to water
solvents, such as dichloromethane and pe-
troleum ether, the analytes under study are
extracted in the organic phase without ad-
ditional co-extractives that were previously
in the acetone phase.
The sample processing, according to
the applied method, was the following (7,
16): an aliquot of 15±0.15 g of the previous-
ly homogenized sample was weighted into
a 250 ml PTFE centrifuge bottle (Nalgene,
Rochester, NY) and 30 ml of acetone were
added and stirred for 1 min in an ultra-tur-
rax homogenizer at 15,000 rpm. Then, 30
ml of dichloromethane and 30 ml of petro-
leum ether were added and the mixture was
stirred again for 1 min. The sample was cen-
trifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min, 15 ml of the
supernatant liquid were transferred in a flat-
bottom long necked flask and evaporated
to dryness in a water bath at 65–70
o
C and 3
ml of methanol/water (30:70 v/v) were add-
ed as follows: 0.9 ml of methanol were add-
ed in the flask, the extract was placed in an
ultrasonic bath for 30 sec and transferred
into a 3 ml volumetric flask; the flat-bottom
long necked flask was rinsed twice with 1 ml
of water, the resulting solution was trans-
ferred into the 3 ml volumetric flask and wa-
ter was added to the mark. The final extract
was placed in an ultrasonic bath for 30 sec
and was then transferred into a vial with a
Teflon stopper. The final extract was filtered
through a disposable PTFE syringe filter, 0.45
μm in diameter and 5 μl of the final extract
were injected in the chromatographic sys-
tem. The MS/MS acquisition method includ-
ed the monitoring of one transition, that of
the quantification, for each compound, as
shown in Table 2.
6. Confirmation
The confirmation of positive findings
was achieved by a second injection under
the chromatographic conditions described
above. Individual MS/MS acquisition meth-
ods, including both transitions of Table 2 for
each separate analyte, were developed and
used for confirmation purposes. Then, an in-
dependent confirmation injection was per-
formed for every positive sample. Confirma-
tion included retention times of standard
and sample acceptable tolerances and the
ion ratios of qualifier and quantifier ions, as
they are referred in the Document No SAN-
CO/2007/3131 (5). The retention time of the
analyte in the sample extract must match
that of the matrix-matched calibration stan-
dard with a tolerance of ±2.5%.
Results and discussion
1. Pesticide and parameter selection
The ionization of the 56 pesticides and
metabolites in positive electrospray ion
mode was studied. Table 2 shows the pre-
cursor ions used for data acquisition, the
transitions used for quantification and qual-
ification, the capillary voltage and collision
cell energy for each transition, segments
(time windows) and the retention times of
the analytes in which the transitions were
scanned. Pesticides and metabolites were
ionized in the form of [M+H]
+
.
Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)
provides a powerful confirmatory tool for
pesticide residue analysis because it dis-