© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
        
        
          LC-MS/MS multiresidue method in peaches
        
        
          83
        
        
          b
        
        
          the slope of the regression line.
        
        
          The precision of the method was esti-
        
        
          mated by assessing the relative standard de-
        
        
          viation (RSD) values of the five replicates at
        
        
          both levels. According to the Document No
        
        
          SANCO/2007/3131, repeatability with RSD ≤
        
        
          20% is considered to be acceptable. The lim-
        
        
          it of quantification (LOQ) was established as
        
        
          the lowest concentration that gave satisfac-
        
        
          tory recovery (70–110%) and precision (RSD
        
        
          ≤ 20%) data.
        
        
          Linearity
        
        
          Good linearity was found for most pes-
        
        
          ticides with correlation coefficients better
        
        
          than 0.990 in most cases. However, deme-
        
        
          ton-S-methyl, fenpyroximate and methio-
        
        
          carb sulfone did not exhibit a linear behav-
        
        
          ior at the concentration range under study,
        
        
          but at a narrower linear range, as shown in
        
        
          Table 3. The dynamic linear range in electro-
        
        
          spray ionization can be limited and gener-
        
        
          ally depends on the physicochemical char-
        
        
          acteristics of the analyte (3). In Table 3, the
        
        
          basic calibration line parameters for the 56
        
        
          compounds are presented (13).
        
        
          Accuracy and precision
        
        
          Recovery and repeatability of the meth-
        
        
          od were established in order to evaluate the
        
        
          method’s accuracy and precision, respec-
        
        
          tively. Recoveries of 70–120% with a repeat-
        
        
          ability RSD ≤ 20% are considered acceptable
        
        
          (5), while in routine analysis, the acceptable
        
        
          recoveries are  60 - 140%. The recoveries were
        
        
          calculated using matrix-matched single-lev-
        
        
          el calibration standards. Table 4 shows the
        
        
          detailed recovery and repeatability data of
        
        
          the pesticides studied. The majority of the
        
        
          pesticides produced recoveries and RSD val-
        
        
          ues within the accepted ones.
        
        
          The recoveries of the pesticides ranged
        
        
          from 65.7 to 125.3% with relative stand-
        
        
          ard deviations (RSDs) less than 24.7% at the
        
        
          lowest concentration level and from 70 to
        
        
          110.9%with RSDs less than 27.1% at the high-
        
        
          est level. In the cases of alachlor, aldicarb,
        
        
          aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfoxide, bro-
        
        
          muconazole, carbofuran 3-hydroxy, deme-
        
        
          ton–S-methyl, hexaconazole, mepanipyrim,
        
        
          methiocarb sulfone, methiocarb sulfoxide
        
        
          and pyrimethanil, the recovery and repeat-
        
        
          ability values at the lowest concentration
        
        
          level were outside the acceptable levels.
        
        
          Therefore, the method is not considered
        
        
          suitable for the determination of these com-
        
        
          pounds at the lowest level. For clofentezine,
        
        
          fenpyroximate, indoxacarb and prochloraz,
        
        
          the RSDs at the highest concentration lev-
        
        
          el were above 20%, but with satisfactory re-
        
        
          coveries.
        
        
          Limit of quantification/Limit of detection
        
        
          As limit of quantification (LOQ) of the
        
        
          method, the lowest validated level that pro-
        
        
          duced acceptable accuracy and precision
        
        
          results, which in most cases was 0.01 mg/
        
        
          kg, was selected. In the cases of alachlor,
        
        
          aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfox-
        
        
          ide, bromuconazole, carbofuran 3-hydroxy,
        
        
          demeton-S-methyl sulfoxide, hexaconazole,
        
        
          mepanipyrim, methiocarb sulfone, methio-
        
        
          carb sulfoxide and pyrimethanil, the LOQ
        
        
          was set at 0.05 mg/kg.
        
        
          The limit of detection (LOD) of the meth-
        
        
          od is the minimum concentration or mass
        
        
          of the analyte that can be detected with ac-
        
        
          ceptable certainty, though not quantifiable
        
        
          with acceptable precision. The LOD of the
        
        
          method was calculated as three times low-
        
        
          er than the LOQ (LOQ = 3xLOD).
        
        
          
            5. Analysis of real samples
          
        
        
          To evaluate its application, the proposed
        
        
          methodology was applied to the analysis of
        
        
          real stone fruit samples. All samples were
        
        
          extracted and analysed as described above
        
        
          and the results are presented in Table 5. A
        
        
          total of 14 samples of various stone fruit
        
        
          (apricots, cherries, peaches and plums) were
        
        
          analysed. Pesticide residues were found in
        
        
          five out of the 14 samples. The pesticides
        
        
          found were: carbaryl, carbendazim, indox-
        
        
          acarb, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and
        
        
          thiacloprid. Three fruit samples contained
        
        
          only one pesticide and two samples con-
        
        
          tained two pesticides of the pesticides stud-
        
        
          ied. However, the concentrations of the an-
        
        
          alytes found in the samples, except for one
        
        
          sample, were lower than the MRLs estab-