© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
p
-menthane type compounds against mosquito
37
titative data were obtained electronically
from FID area percent data without the use
of correction factors. Qualitative analysis of
the essential oils was performed using the
same conditions with GC, in a Hewlett Pack-
ard II 5890 gas chromatograph equipped
with Hewlett Packard II 5972 mass selec-
tive detector in the electron impact mode
(70 eV). Most ingredients of the essential
oils were identified on the basis of compari-
son of GC relative retention times and mass
spectra with those of pure standards. As for
the rest components, tentative identifica-
tion was based on the comparison of their
mass spectra and elution order with those
obtained from the NIST 98 and Wiley 275 li-
brary data of the GC-MS system and from
Adams CD computer library (1).
Isolation of Essential Oils Major Ingredi-
ents
Ten (10) g of the extracted crude essential
oils EOpul1, EOpul2, EOpul3, EOpip and EOsp
were fractioned by column chromatography
on silica gel and eluted with a gradient of sol-
vents of increasing polarity (pentane + dieth-
yl ether: 100 + 0, 97 + 3, 95 + 5, 93 + 7, 90 +
10 and 80 + 20). Column fractions were moni-
tored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) with
pentane + diethyl ether (9.5 + 0.5). Fractions
with similar R
f
values on the TLC plates to au-
thentic co-eluted compounds were pooled.
Spots were detected under UV lamp and af-
terwards by spraying with a mixture of 1%
vanillin and 5% sulfuric acid solution (in eth-
anol) and heating at 120
o
C and/or PMA solu-
tion (phosphomolybdic acid 7.5%mgl
-1
in eth-
anol) and charring on a hot plate. The chosen
fractions merged to one and elution solvents
removed by a rotary flash evaporator. The dis-
tillation was stopped when the volume of sol-
vents was reduced to ~10 ml and completed
by flushing through nitrogen.
Mosquito Rearing
The colony of the species
Cx. pipiens
bi-
otype
molestus
has been maintained in the
laboratory of Benaki Phytopathological In-
stitute, Kifissia, Greece for more than 25
years. Adult mosquitoes are kept in wood-
en framed cages (33x33x33 cm) with a 32x32
mesh at 25±2
o
C, 80±2% relative humidi-
ty and photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) h. Cotton
wicks saturated with 10% sucrose solution
are used as food source. Females lay eggs in
round, plastic containers (10 cm diameter x
5 cm depth) filled with 150 ml of tap water.
Egg rafts are removed daily and placed in
cylindrical enamel pans (with diameter of 35
cm and 10 cm deep), in order to hatch. Lar-
vae are reared under the same conditions of
temperature and light and are fed daily with
baby fish food (TetraMin, Baby Fish Food) at
a concentration of 0.25 gl
-1
of water until pu-
pation. Pupae are then collected and intro-
duced into the adult rearing cages.
Larvicidal Bioassays
Stock solutions were prepared in etha-
nol with a concentration of 1% mgl
-1
. A se-
ries of aqueous solutions of the tested ma-
terial, expressed as mgl
-1
, were made and
tested under laboratory conditions. Prelim-
inary experiments (data not shown) were
performed to evaluate toxicity and subse-
quently different concentrations were em-
ployed ranging from 10 to 200 mgl
-1
for each
tested material.
The larval mortality bioassays were carried
out according to the test method of larval sus-
ceptibility as proposed by the World Health
Organization (24). Twenty 3
rd
to 4
th
instar lar-
vae of the species
Cx. pipiens
biotype
moles-
tus
were collected from the colony. They were
placed in glass beaker with 250 ml of aqueous
suspension of tested material at various con-
centrations and an emulsifier was added in
the final test solution (less than 0.05%). Four
replicates were made per concentration and a
control treatment with tap water and emulsifi-
er was also included. Beakers with larvae were
placed at 25±2
o
C, 80±2% relative humidity
and photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) h.
Data Analysis
Larvicidal effect was recorded 48 h after
treatment. Data obtained from each dose–
larvicidal bioassay (total mortality, mgl
-1
concentration in water) were subjected to
probit analysis in which probit–transformed
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,...46