© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
Operator exposure levels and evaluation of different coverall performance
15
idence for reducing the operator exposure
levels during application of plant protection
products.
Moreover, in the present study, the com-
parison of the PDE and ADE values for the
A1-A5 and B1-B5 operator groups can be
used as a measure of PPE performance in
terms of coverall penetration, which can be
expressed as:
% penetration = 100 x ADE /PDE
From the aforementioned exposure
data, the average penetration for Type A
coverall is 0.79%, while for Type B coverall is
2.76% showing that the average Type B cov-
erall penetration is 3.5 times higher than the
respective one of Type A. It is noteworthy
that this difference in coverall performance
is in accordance with the results of previous
work addressing spray gun greenhouse ap-
plications, where Type B coverall was found
to be 3.5 times more permeable than Type
A. This difference in coverall performance
becomes evident under relatively high ex-
posure conditions, while no significant dif-
ferences are observed in low exposure sce-
narios (8). However, both coverall types
provided satisfactory protection under the
conditions of the specific trials.
Literature Cited
Durham, W.F. and Wolfe, H.T. 1962. Measure-
1.
ment of the Exposure of Workers to Pesticides.
Bulletin WHO
, 26: 75-91
Προσδιορισμός επιπέδων έκθεσης ψεκαστών σε
φυτοπροστατευτικά προϊόντα κατά τις εφαρμογές σε
θερμοκήπια με ψεκαστικό μέσο νέου τύπου πολλαπλών μπεκ
και χρήση δύο διαφορετικών τύπων προστατευτικής φόρμας
Α.Ν. Τσακιράκης, Κ.Μ. Κασιώτης, Π. Αναστασιάδου και Κ. Μαχαίρα
Περίληψη
Στόχος της συγκεκριμένης μελέτης ήταν α) ο προσδιορισμός των επιπέδων έκθεσης ψε-
καστών κατά την εφαρμογή μυκητοκτόνου σε θερμοκηπιακές καλλιέργειες πιπεριάς στο Τυμπάκι Ηρα-
κλείου Κρήτης με ένα νέο ψεκαστικό μέσο εφαρμογής 4 ακροφυσίων (Νovi-F), β) η σύγκριση των επι-
πέδων έκθεσης των ψεκαστών με το νέο αυτό μέσο σε σχέση με συμβατικές τεχνικές ψεκασμού (ψε-
καστικό πιστόλι), και γ) η σύγκριση της περατότητας δύο τύπων προστατευτικών φορμών (η μία από
Goumenou, M. and Machera, K. 2001. Determi-
2.
nation of Penconazole on Personal Protection
Equipment after Field Applications.
Fresenius
Journal of Anaytical Chemistry,
370: 946-950.
Machera, K., Goumenou, M., Kapetanakis, E., Ka-
3.
lamarakis, A. and Glass, C.R. 2003. Determina-
tion of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Opera-
tor Exposure to Malathion in Greenhouses with
the Whole Body Dosimetry Method.
Annals of
Occupational Hygiene,
47: 61-70.
Machera, K., Goumenou, M., Kapetanakis, E.,
4.
Tsatsakis, A. and Glass, C.R. 2001. Determina-
tion of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Expo-
sure of Operators following Malathion 50EC Ap-
plications on Greenhouse Tomatoes.
Toxicology,
164: 85.
Machera, K, Tsakirakis, A, Charistou, A, Anasta-
5.
siadou, P. and Glass, C.R. 2009. Dermal Exposure
of Pesticide Applicators as a Measure of Cover-
all Performance under Field Conditions.
Annals
of Occupational Hygiene,
53: 573-584.
Maronim, M., Fanetti, A.C. and Metruccio, F.
6.
2006. Risk Assessment and Management of Oc-
cupational Exposure to Pesticides in Agricul-
ture.
Medicina del Lavoro, 97
: 430–437.
OECD 1997. Environmental Health and Safety
7.
Publications Series on Testing and Assessment
No. 9: Guidance Document for the Conduct of
Studies of Occupational Exposure to Pesticides
during Agricultural Application. OECD, Paris
[OECD/GD (97) 148].
Tsakirakis, A., Kasiotis, K.M., Arapakis, N., Charis-
8.
tou, A., Tsatsakis, A., Glass C.R. and Machera,
K. Determination of Operator Exposure Levels
to Insecticide during Bait Applications in Olive
Trees: Study of Coverall Performance and Dura-
tion of Application (
submitted for publication
)
Received: 3 December 2009; Accepted: 27 January 2010
1...,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,...34